我来我网
https://5come5.cn
 
您尚未 登录  注册 | 菠菜 | 软件站 | 音乐站 | 邮箱1 | 邮箱2 | 风格选择 | 更多 » 
 

本页主题: Putclub朗诵比赛获奖作品(应该是获奖了吧~) 显示签名 | 打印 | 加为IE收藏 | 收藏主题 | 上一主题 | 下一主题

barry343



性别: 帅哥 状态: 该用户目前不在线
头衔: ~×世界大同,阿弥陀佛×~
等级: 人见人爱
家族: Jane靓颖
发贴: 2755
威望: 0
浮云: 1559
在线等级:
注册时间: 2005-10-17
最后登陆: 2014-04-18

5come5帮你背单词 [ spot /spot/ n. 点,斑点,污点,地点,场所;vt. 认出,发现,玷污,污辱;vi. 沾上污点 ]


Putclub朗诵比赛获奖作品(应该是获奖了吧~)




由于有两段录音,请先按ESC键。再选择你想听的播放。 :)

一个朋友在putclub做版主,前两天给我发了两段他们做活动收到的录音。

活动内容是要求网友朗读以下文章,然后自己录音并发送给putclub。

朋友被震撼到了,我也是。感觉像是CrazyEnglish里面配音人的感觉。听着非常舒服。
大家听听看呢?

也算是对我们提高口语的一个鞭策吧。

以下是要求朗读的文章:
Quote:

WHY DO WE BELIEVE THAT THE EARTH IS ROUND?
George Orwell


Somewhere or other—I think it is in the preface to Saint Joan—Bernard Shaw remarks that we are more gullible and superstitious today than we were in the Middle Ages, and as an example of modern credulity he cites the widespread belief that the earth is round. The average man, says Shaw, can advance not a single reason for thinking that the earth is round. He merely swallows this theory because there is something about it that appeals to the twentieth-century mentality.

Now, Shaw is exaggerating, but there is something in what he says, and the question is worth following up, for the sake of the light it throws on modern knowledge. Just why do we believe that the earth is round? I am not speaking of the few thousand astronomers, geographers and so forth who could give ocular proof, or have a theoretical knowledge of the proof, but of the ordinary newspaper-reading citizen, such as you or me.

As for the Flat Earth theory, I believe I could refute it. If you stand by the seashore on a clear day, you can see the masts and funnels of invisible ships passing along the horizon. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the earth’s surface is curved. But it does not follow that the earth is spherical. Imagine another theory called the Oval Earth theory, which claims that the earth is shaped like an egg. What can I say against it?

Against the Oval Earth man, the first card I can play is the analogy of the sun and moon. The Oval Earth man promptly answers that I don’t know, by my own observation, that those bodies are spherical. I only know that they are round, and they may perfectly well be flat discs. I have no answer to that one. Besides, he goes on, what reason have I for thinking that the earth must be the same shape as the sun and moon? I can’t answer that one either.

My second card is the earth’s shadow: when cast on the moon during eclipses, it appears to be the shadow of a round object. But how do I know, demands the Oval Earth man, that eclipses of the moon are caused by the shadow of the earth? The answer is that I don’t know, but have taken this piece of information blindly from newspaper articles and science booklets.

Defeated in the minor exchanges, I now play my queen of trumps: the opinion of the experts. The astronomer Royal, who ought to know, tells me that the earth is round. The Oval Earth man covers that queen with his king. Have I tested the Astronomer Royal’s statement, and would I even know a way of testing it? Here I bring out my ace. Yes, I do know one test. The astronomers can foretell eclipses, and this suggests that their opinions about the solar system are pretty sound. I am, to my delight, justified in accepting their say-so about the shape of the earth.

If the Oval Earth man answers—what I believe is true—that the ancient Egyptians, who thought the sun goes round the earth, could also predict eclipses, then bang goes my ace. I have only one card left: navigation. People can sail ships round the world, and reach the places they aim at, by calculations which assume that the earth is spherical. I believe that finishes the Oval Earth man, though even then he may possibly have some kind of counter.

It will be seen that my reasons for thinking that the earth is round are rather precarious ones. Yet this is an exceptionally elementary piece of information. On most other questions I should have to fall back on the expert much earlier, and would be less able to test his pronouncements. And much the greater part of our knowledge is at this level. It does not rest on reasoning or on experiment, but on authority. And how can it be otherwise, when the range of knowledge is so vast that the expert himself is an ignoramus as soon as he strays away from his own specialty? Most people, if asked to prove that the earth is round, would not even bother to produce the rather weak arguments I have outlined above. They would start off by saying that “everyone knows” the earth to be round, and if pressed further, would become angry. In a way Shaw is right. This is a credulous age, and the burden of knowledge which we now have to carry is partly responsible.


本帖最近评分记录:
  • 浮云:10 (by fan) | 理由: 有心了。托业。。加油。。
  • 顶端 Posted: 2006-11-03 17:40 | [楼 主]
    barry343



    性别: 帅哥 状态: 该用户目前不在线
    头衔: ~×世界大同,阿弥陀佛×~
    等级: 人见人爱
    家族: Jane靓颖
    发贴: 2755
    威望: 0
    浮云: 1559
    在线等级:
    注册时间: 2005-10-17
    最后登陆: 2014-04-18

    5come5帮你背单词 [ biography /bai'ogrəfi/ n. 传记 ]


    另外一段,女声
    顶端 Posted: 2006-11-03 17:41 | [1 楼]
    坏孩子



    创作大师奖
    性别: 帅哥 状态: 该用户目前不在线
    头衔: 邂逅不沾尘世喧嚣的魅惑
    等级: 成就辉煌
    家族: 丢丢
    发贴: 21013
    威望: 3
    浮云: 1712
    在线等级:
    注册时间: 2006-01-09
    最后登陆: 2015-12-13

    5come5帮你背单词 [ both /bəuθ/ a. 两个…(都);pron. 两者(都),双方(都) ]


    我感觉语调不好
    ~
    顶端 Posted: 2006-11-03 17:49 | [2 楼]
    barry343



    性别: 帅哥 状态: 该用户目前不在线
    头衔: ~×世界大同,阿弥陀佛×~
    等级: 人见人爱
    家族: Jane靓颖
    发贴: 2755
    威望: 0
    浮云: 1559
    在线等级:
    注册时间: 2005-10-17
    最后登陆: 2014-04-18

    5come5帮你背单词 [ gesture /'d3əestə/ n. 手势,资势,表示,资态 ]


    Quote:
    引用第2楼坏孩子于2006-11-03 17:49发表的:
    我感觉语调不好
    ~


    蝈蝈也可以自己录一小段发上来嘛~挑战一下
    顶端 Posted: 2006-11-03 17:57 | [3 楼]
    我来我网·5come5 Forum » 外语乐园

    Total 0.639071(s) query 7, Time now is:06-19 07:11, Gzip enabled
    Powered by PHPWind v5.3, Localized by 5come5 Tech Team, 黔ICP备16009856号